Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Suma who wrote (50078)	6/30/2004 2:46:54 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 89467

If'n I were any calmer, I'd be a sleepin'... "As you often call people,BUSH HATERS..." Could you please post the links to the places where I have called anyone BUSH HATERS. You said, 'often,' and since I post nearly everyday there must be hundreds of them. Well, if you could show me just one, I would appreciate it. I am getting forgetful and I can't remember saying that even one time. I remember not caring if people like Bush or not. I myself have called him a howdy doody Texan. Not because I do or don't like him but just as a chide about his presentation style and in regards to how much 'help' he needs to communicate the Republican platform that he stands on. I regret that characterization but I did post it, so I guess I have to live with it. Anyway it was an honest sentiment on my part but probably not necessary to post in public. Well, I don't remember it but it could be Alzheimers or something so I'd appreciate your help on this... less'n you be mistaken???

To: Suma who wrote (50078)	6/30/2004 2:58:16 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 89467

"Now, having read Hillary's book ... Of course. If your smitten with bill, hill must be a thrill. Does the term opportunistic enabler mean anything to you? Probably not.

To: Suma who wrote (50078)	7/9/2004 8:49:36 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 89467

Now, having read Hillary's book I can tell you that you are way off base and in fact, wrong about most of what you posted here... The Clintons are able to accomplish their goals much more by fraud than by genuine political leadership. The outcome for the mass of citizens who allow themselves to be used under the guise of left wing social movement has been to be degraded into deceitful, perfidious flatterers. The test of this statement is simple. The left wing social movement was in full swing when b. Clinton was elected president. How much progress has there been on the left wing social agenda beyond the first year of his tenure as president? The answer: little to none. In fact, to a great extent left wing social agendas were sacrificed so that he could stay in POWER. b.clinton employed charm, and cunning strategic actions in order to maintain power. And of course, paving the road to hillary’s congressional seat was a way to continue that. Of course he used the power of his left wing machinery to gain and maintain the power of administration over the greatest super power the world has ever known. Why? Well, certainly the power of the political machinery in the process of acquiring the power to lead our great nation is justified. It is, in fact, the only method available to achieve this goal. There are of course supposed to be worthy and honorable causes that the politician is championing in the process. In this case it was more dogma than cause and it rested on a foundation that crumbled beneath clinton's feet. Clinton, of course knew this and as we look back, it appears b.Clinton was/is ready, willing, and able to employ every self serving strategy to obtain and maintain power for the sake of nothing more than the illusion of holding onto it. Was that in hillary's book?