SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (192777)7/1/2004 9:42:41 AM
From: TigerPaw  Respond to of 1576858
 
While the first primaries were no earlier than usual,
But you can see that the majority of the primaries were in February, which is a change from their usual position of March and April.
thegreenpapers.com

In previous years there was a gap of time, perhaps 6 weeks, to ponder the results from New Hampshire and Iowa.

TP



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (192777)7/1/2004 11:36:11 AM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576858
 
AFAIK, the primaries were no earlier than any other election season. The media hype just started a little earlier because of the very wide range of Democratic candidates. Remember when Howard Dean used to be the "main man" of the leftist media? That was before he self-destructed. Look at how the media conveniently forgot how they once propped up that guy.

"Propped up that guy"? From where are you getting this stuff?

ted



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (192777)7/1/2004 11:57:41 AM
From: SilentZ  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576858
 
>AFAIK, the primaries were no earlier than any other election season. The media hype just started a little earlier because of the very wide range of Democratic candidates.

Not correct.

foxnews.com

-Z