Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Fahrenheit 9/11: Michael Moore's Masterpiece -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Proud_Infidel who wrote (1514)	7/1/2004 11:35:06 AM
From: epicure	Respond to of 2772

Oh dear oh dear oh dear I'm on ignore? Oh my How shall I carry on? :-) Probably quite well.

To: Proud_Infidel who wrote (1514)	7/1/2004 12:42:34 PM
From: Poet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2772

Arguments cannot be won by patronizing. Quite right. It only diminishes the patronizer.

To: Proud_Infidel who wrote (1514)	7/1/2004 12:56:23 PM
From: average joe	Respond to of 2772

X feels herself obliged to preach what she can’t practice.

To: Proud_Infidel who wrote (1514)	7/1/2004 2:02:47 PM
From: exdaytrader76	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2772

With about 10,000 civilian dead alone, more than half of that number should be women. iraqbodycount.net So if you could find 4,997 more women who supported the Americans, then we could at least break even with the number that we murdered. from the mouths of women in Iraq How many? Three? Is there any statistical fortitude to that sample? 24 million Iraqi's, at least half are female, much likely it's a higher percentage, so there's a population of at least 12 million women, and your conclusions are drawn from a non-random sample of three? And you have the nerve to call someone else: utterly naieve and stupid; no other way to characterize it. ????