SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Israel to U.S. : Now Deal with Syria and Iran -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Thomas M. who wrote (5367)7/2/2004 10:39:02 AM
From: Pogeu Mahone  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 22250
 
A win -win for the U.S.
Bush or kerry


Kerry takes a stronger pro-Israel line
By Bryan Bender, Globe Staff | July 2, 2004

WASHINGTON -- Senator John F. Kerry strikes a decidedly stronger pro-Israel position in a new policy paper than he did a few months ago, as he attempts to enlist the support of Jewish voters who have been gravitating to President Bush and away from their tradition of voting Democratic in presidential elections.

In the policy paper, which has not been released publicly, Kerry outlines clear, strongly worded positions on several issues important to the American Jewish community. He calls for more forceful action to prevent Iran from gaining nuclear weapons, fully backs Israel's construction of a 425-mile-long barrier between Israel and the Palestinian territories that the paper refers to as ''a security fence," and pledges to work to push for a new Palestinian political class to replace Yasser Arafat, who is called a ''failed leader."

Earlier in the campaign, Kerry got off to a shaky start with some Jewish groups. Last October he called the barrier -- composed mostly of electronic fencing with razor wire and a ditch along a tracking road, but with some stretches made of concrete -- a ''barrier to peace." The new paper says building it is ''a legitimate right of self-defense" and ''not a matter" to be taken up by the International Court of Justice, which has criticized the move.

On Wednesday, Israel's High Court of Justice, responding to Palestinian complaints, issued a landmark ruling saying a planned 20-mile section of the barrier in the West Bank must be rerouted, because the current path creates hardships for thousands of Palestinians.

The Massachusetts senator earlier remarked that he might appoint James A. Baker III, secretary of state in the first Bush administration, a special peace negotiator. Jewish groups quickly attacked the proposal and accused Baker of making anti-Israel statements. The paper, drafted by policy and political advisers, does not say who Kerry would pick for that role.

With the paper, titled ''Strengthening Israel's Security and Bolstering the US-Israel Special Relationship," Kerry is attempting to reintroduce himself to Jewish voters. ''John Kerry has been at the forefront of the fight for Israel's security during his 19 years in the US Senate," it says. ''His pro-Israel voting record is second to none."

Republicans suggested some political desperation was behind the document.

''There is a key battle for the Jewish vote underway," said Matt Brooks, executive director of the Republican Jewish Coalition, based in Washington. ''Democrats are particularly scared. This underscores the efforts they have to make to hold on to what was a sure part of their base. The reason for their efforts is this president is going to do substantially better than he did in 2000. That has them worried."

Traditionally, the overwhelming majority of Jewish voters have backed the Democratic nominee for the White House; in 2000, 19 percent went for President Bush. The Bush-Cheney campaign is hoping to capitalize on the president's strong support for the Israeli government, the military removal of Saddam Hussein, and the pursuit of the war on terrorism to increase that support to 30 percent or more in November. In a closely contested election, those voters could prove critical in swing states such as Florida, Pennsylvania, and Ohio.

Some Jewish leaders say that Kerry's record on Israel is not well known outside Washington and Massachusetts.

''They have done a lot of catching up [to Bush] and are more effectively reaching out," said Malcolm Hoenlein, executive vice president of the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations, based in New York.

Added David Harris, executive director of the nonpartisan American Jewish Committee in New York: ''I think as the campaign has found its footing, there has unquestionably been a significant outreach to the Jewish community," particularly in recent weeks.

A staunchly pro-Israel stance may have other political repercussions.

James Zogby, president of the Arab-American Institute in Washington, said many Arab-American voters remain undecided about the candidates and could be pushed to support Bush. He estimated as many as 28 percent, or 170,000 voters.

They are also an important voting bloc in swing states such as Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Florida, he said. ''American Jews are voting Democratic, and it has nothing to do with Israel," he said. ''They know Kerry will be good on Israel. My community is not a lock either way. The question [is], is the margin you lose in our community greater than the margin you win in the Jewish communities?"

Nevertheless, Kerry has redoubled his efforts to reach out to Jewish groups. Senior members of his staff met in Washington with the American Jewish Committee on Wednesday.

The policy paper, used as talking points in some of these meetings, attempts to portray his pro-Israel credentials as being as strong as, if not stronger than, Bush's. The document says, for instance, ''Israel's cause must be America's cause."

It chides the Bush administration for not taking stronger action to prevent Iran, a primary supporter of anti-Israel terrorist groups, from developing nuclear weapons.

''The failure of the Bush administration to thwart Iran's efforts to amass nuclear weapons poses a real threat to the safety and security of Israel, the US, and the rest of the free world," it says.

It also says that Kerry was a sponsor of the Syria Accountability Act, which banned certain American exports in an effort to punish the Arab nation for supporting anti-Israel terror groups.

Kerry expresses support for Sharon's plan to withdraw from Gaza, says that after a final settlement Palestinians must settle outside Israel, and backs the Israeli plan to annex some West Bank settlements, as Bush does. The paper also reaffirms Kerry's support for Israel's spring 2002 offensive against Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and other terrorists groups in Gaza and the West Bank.

The document also pledges that a Kerry administration would work to strengthen Israel's economy, by helping jump-start the high-tech sector, investing further in Israeli-made homeland security technologies, and increasing cooperation between Israeli industries and the US Department of Homeland Security.

The paper says that ''John Kerry understands that anti-Semitism masked in anti-Israel rhetoric is a dangerous trend threatening both Israel and Jewish communities around the world." He also pledges to ''take governments around the world to task for failing to address this escalating threat."

''Most of his ideas are in the mainstream, and they are not that different from President Bush's," said Edward S. Walker, former assistant secretary of state for Near East Affairs.

Harris, of the American Jewish Committee, stressed that American Jews do not vote purely on a candidate's stance on Mideast issues, but they are extremely important to them. ''American Jews tend to be multi-issue voters but need a certain comfort level on Israel," he said.

Bender can be reached at bender@globe.com.


© Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company



To: Thomas M. who wrote (5367)7/3/2004 10:42:54 AM
From: Pogeu Mahone  Respond to of 22250
 
Tom
these people are setting the proper example for muslims like you
Please learn from this:

Afghan Mosque's Founders Say Imam Who Ejected Them Must Go
By COREY KILGANNON

Published: July 3, 2004

everal days after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks - with the words "Taliban," "Afghanistan" and "Osama" flashing red-hot across TV screens and the public consciousness - a power struggle erupted at the city's largest Afghan mosque, amid accusations of money being funneled to Taliban militants.

Advertisement


Mohammed Sherzad, the popular imam of the temple, the Hazrat-I-Abubakr Sadiq mosque in Flushing, Queens, publicly accused a group of its founders of sympathizing and doing business with Taliban leaders and funneling congregants' donations to them.

The imam ejected the group, which denied the allegations. Group members accused Imam Sherzad of seizing on post-9/11 hatred of the Taliban to demonize the very leaders who had hired him and to wrest control of the mosque.

The group of leaders decided to fight back in the courts. They filed a lawsuit in 2001 in Queens Supreme Court to regain the mosque and oust the imam.

The case caused much hand-wringing in the Afghan community, and on June 25, State Supreme Court Justice Phyllis Orlikoff Flug declared that the mosque indeed belonged to the ousted group, known as the Afghan Turkistan Islamic Foundation in America. In a ruling first reported by Newsday on Thursday, Justice Flug said that the foundation had formed a corporation to buy the property in 1987 and had built the current mosque, which opened in 1999.

The president of the foundation, Rahman Jalili, 53, a civil engineer from Farmingdale, on Long Island, said his group would select a new spiritual leader. Imam Sherzad, he said, must leave the mosque by the end of this month.

"He turned the mosque into his own political base," Mr. Jalili said, adding that the foundation had hired the imam when it founded the mosque, only to be betrayed by him. "He formed a mob-rule gang, and he changed the locks on us so we could no longer worship in our own mosque."

Sitting in his office on Thursday, staring at his cellphone and prayer book, Imam Sherzad said it was Mr. Jalili's group that did wrong by bringing chaos to a thriving, peaceful mosque that thousands of Afghan immigrants have come to rely upon as a religious and social center.

"It's very sad: People are coming to me and asking, 'Where are we supposed to go now?' " he said.

Imam Sherzad said that he built the mosque into one of the most influential Afghan institutions in the United States, with 1,400 members and as many as 3,000 visitors on holidays. Almost all of them, he said, were loyal to him and would follow him if he leaves. That, he said, would lead to upheaval in the Afghan community.

The imam said that as the father of the mosque, he planned to meet with his worshipers to decide whether to appeal the case. "Whatever the court decides, I have to respect," he said, "but it would not be fair to take the mosque away from the people."

The Abubakr mosque is a gathering place for many of the roughly 20,000 Afghan immigrants in the New York area. Located alongside several Korean churches on 33rd Avenue, a quiet suburban street, the mosque's facade is a blend of ancient Muslim arching designs and a smooth gray marble. A sign at the entrance says, "Enter ye here in peace and security."

But since opening five years ago, the mosque has been in turmoil, much of it reflecting the ethnic divisions and tensions that plagued Afghan mosques across the country as the Taliban rose to power in Afghanistan. Matters got worse after the Sept. 11 attacks.

Mr. Jalili said that he and other prosperous Afghan immigrants bought a single-family home on 33rd Avenue in 1987 and turned it into a modest mosque. To avoid ethnic tensions, they wrote bylaws that prohibited political activity. He said they had hired Imam Sherzad as a spiritual leader but discovered he was vocal about his support for certain warlords who were fighting the Taliban.

Imam Sherzad began collecting donations from the congregation and tried to take over formal ownership, Mr. Jalili said. The group tried to fire him, but the imam, popular with the congregation, refused to leave and effectively seized control from the founders. He changed office locks and hired bodyguards and security to keep out foundation members, Mr. Jalili said. In April 2001, the foundation sued to have him removed and to regain the mosque.

"This is an employee who basically took over the business," said Joseph Ortego, a lawyer for the foundation.

Right after the 2001 terror attacks, Imam Sherzad condemned the Taliban, who were helping to hide Osama bin Laden, and accused foundation members of supporting, doing business with and funneling mosque contributions to Taliban leaders. He also blamed them for a speech at the mosque given years ago by the Egyptian cleric Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman, a blind fundamentalist Muslim serving a life sentence for conspiring to blow up New York landmarks.

The imam's accusations made headlines. Foundation members soon found themselves unwelcome and began praying in the basement or outside the mosque. After episodes of physical conflict between the two sides, the founders eventually left.

This week, Mr. Jalili dismissed the Taliban allegations and said that the group had vacated the mosque in order to "leave everything in the hands of the law." He accused the imam of essentially using the 9/11 attacks to seize control of the mosque by harnessing the anti-Taliban fervor to intimidate and slander the foundation.

This week, Imam Sherzad reiterated his belief that foundation members harassed and tried to fire him because of his denunciation of the Taliban and Osama bin Laden. It was mosque members who selected him leader and financed the mosque, not the foundation, he said.

Mr. Jalili said that the current congregation, but not Imam Sherzad, will be welcome at the mosque.

Subscribe Today: Home Delivery of The Times from $2.90/wk.