To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (192831 ) 7/1/2004 2:01:38 PM From: tejek Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577029 It was Howard Dean's face that dominated the magazine covers on the newsstands, bookstores, supermarket checkout lines, etc. Who picked him out of the whole bunch of Democratic candidates? Oh yeah, a few initial polls that showed him to have a lead of a few points over any of the others. The media for lack of a better story picks up on the results of that poll and sensationalizes it beyond what its significance should be. People start to look at Howard Dean more than any of the other candidates, and soon the initial interest snowballs into "front-runner status." Come on, you are not this stupid. Howard Dean was the first guy to say the war was a sham and that he was opposed to it. Back then, most Dems were treading carefully when it came to the war issue and the war president. Dean openly said that Bush was a smuck. Back then, that was big news........and the media was loving it. They didn't have to prop him up; he was making their headlines. Of course, since Dean and thanks to him, we have come 180 degrees and now his stance seems more mainstream.Unfortunately for Dean that proved to be his downfall. He became the target of all the other candidates, including Kerry, and consequently Dean's negatives were exposed too early. That, plus a few gaffes (which admittedly is hard to avoid when a politician with not much national experience is being interviewed so much) helped him to lose the early advantage he once held. Then after Kerry pulled off his surprise victory, Dean self-destructed, and the media dumped him like an ex-girlfriend. Dean wasn't ready for primetime. Its as simple as that. He had a lot of good ideas but too many of them were ahead of the times. Plus, he doesn't have the physics to be a leader.......tall/handsome/stately. ted