SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: American Spirit who wrote (33280)7/2/2004 10:19:46 PM
From: lorneRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 81568
 
as. You said....." FAHRENHEIT expanding to 1700 theaters this weekend, selling out in red states and military towns. A must-see for anyone who cares about the debate over the heart and soul of this country.".....

The movie is so bad it could help Bush
nydailynews.com


I brought a notebook with me when I went to see Michael Moore's "Fahrenheit 9/11" and in the dark made notes before I gave up, defeated by the utter stupidity of the movie.
One of my notes says "John Ellis," who is a cousin of President Bush and the fellow who called the election for Fox News that dark and infamous night when the presidency - or so the myth goes - was stolen from Al Gore, delivering the nation to Halliburton, the Carlyle Group and Saudi Arabia and plunging it into war. A better synopsis of the movie, you're not likely to read.

Ellis appears early in the film, which is not only appropriate but inevitable. He is the personification of the Moore method, which combines guilt by association with the stunning revelation of a stunning fact that has already been revealed countless times before.

If, for instance, you did a Lexis-Nexis database search for "John Ellis" and "election," you would be told that "the search has been interrupted because it will return more than 1,000 documents."

The Ellis story is no secret.

I go on about Moore and Ellis because the stunning box office success of "Fahrenheit 9/11" is not, as proclaimed, a sure sign that Bush is on his way out, but instead a warning to the Democrats to keep the loony left at a safe distance.

Speaking just for myself, not only was I dismayed by how prosaic and boring the movie was - nothing new and utterly predictable - but I recoiled from Moore's methodology, if it can be called that.

The case against Bush is too hard and too serious to turn into some sort of joke, as Moore has done. The danger of that is twofold: It can send fence-sitters moving, either out of revulsion or sympathy, the other way, and it leads to an easy and facile dismissal of arguments critical of Bush.

During the Vietnam War, it seemed to me that some people supported Richard Nixon not because they thought he was right but because they loathed the war protesters. Beware history repeating itself.

Moore's depiction of why Bush went to war is so silly and so incomprehensible that it is easily dismissed. As far as I can tell, it is a farrago of conspiracy theories. But nothing is said about multiple UN resolutions violated by Iraq or the depredations of Saddam Hussein.

In fact, prewar Iraq is depicted as some sort of Arab folk festival - lots of happy, smiling, indigenous people. Was there no footage of a Kurdish village that had been gassed? This is obscenity by omission.

The case against Bush need not and should not rest on guilt by association or half-baked conspiracy theories, which collapse at the first double take but reinforce the fervor of those already convinced.

The success of Moore's movie, though, suggests this is happening - a dialogue in which anti-Bush forces talk to themselves and do so in a way that puts off others.

I found that happening to me in the runup to the war, when I spent more time and energy arguing with those who said the war was about oil (no!) or Israel (no!) or something just as silly than I did questioning the stated reasons for invading Iraq - weapons of mass destruction and Saddam's links to Osama Bin Laden. This was stupid of me, but human nature nonetheless.

Some of that old feeling returned while watching Moore's assault on the documentary form. It is so juvenile in its approach, so awful in its journalism, such an inside joke for people who already hate Bush, that I found myself feeling a bit sorry for a President who is depicted mostly as a befuddled dope.

I fear how it will play to the undecided. For them, I recommend "Spider-Man 2."



To: American Spirit who wrote (33280)7/2/2004 10:22:33 PM
From: lorneRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568
 
as. You said...." FAHRENHEIT expanding to 1700 theaters this weekend,...."

Moore's film gets rave – from Communists
Stalinist Reds love 'Fahrenheit 9/11,' Maoists love it, too
July 2, 2004

The Communist Party USA and the Revolutionary Communist Party had a nasty ideological split years ago as one faction lined up behind Moscow and the Soviet Union and the other with and China's Mao Zedong.

They still have violent disagreements over goals and tactics, but they agree on one thing. Michael Moore's "Fahrenheit 9/11" rules.

The film got a rave review yesterday in the Communist Party USA's newspaper People's Weekly World. The paper noted the controversial film that rakes the Bush administration over the war in Iraq was packing theaters across the country. The Communist Party USA is fielding no candidate for president, as it usually does, in favor of forming a "united front" for unseating President Bush.

"The movie is a documentary that the American people themselves are a part of," explained the paper. "It follows the dark history of the Bush administration, hatched from the rotten egg of a stolen election. It shines a light on the dark corners of the Bush family’s brazen disenfranchisement of tens of thousands of African American voters in Florida, the Bushes’ early – and oily – alliance with the ruling Saudi families, including the Bin Ladens, and the unspeakable toll on America’s working-class families."

A companion story, reported on a party member who sat in on a conference call chat with Moore organized by Moveon.org in which it claims 54,975 people participated.

"Adopt five people who don’t normally vote, Moore told us by speakerphone, to make sure they get to the polls," the story said. "Make arrangements now to take off Election Day. Every resident of the U.S. lives within driving distance of one of the 'battleground states,' he said, so set aside an autumn weekend to pack up the family and be in one of them, manning phone banks and precinct walking."

The story urged others to sign up on Moveon.org's website for a July 11 phone bank project.

Meanwhile, the RCP's Revolutionary Worker newspaper noted the camaraderie of the fellow believers who packed theaters to witness 'this thing' that promised to change the country.

"'This thing'" is exposing the government – and the Bush crew that runs it," the Revolutionary Worker review said. "Exposing the war in Iraq, the Patriot Act, the stealing of the 2000 election, the worship of the rich, the corruption in high places, and the lies – above all the LIES, that have now been used to conquer countries, send young men and women to kill and die, and cynically keep millions of people in a manipulated 'state of alert.'"

The review continues: "'Fahrenheit 9/11' is hilarious, and savage, and (despite the howls of rightwing attack dogs) overwhelmingly factual. People are sick – to death! – of being muzzled, stifled and gagged. And in this onscreen rush of images and sound, there is a feeling that the cork has been popped. It's like an opening shot to this heated, politicized, dangerous and oh-so-crucial summer."

"Michael Moore has found his own creative way to say "NO!" to this Bush agenda, to its juggernaut of war and repression," the Revolutionary Worker said. "He has said it with his satirical, impish and provocateurish riffs – from his own, social democratic point of view."