Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: exdaytrader76 who wrote (138685)	7/2/2004 11:11:52 PM
From: ManyMoose	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

Discussion of Michael Moore's film is DEFINITELY ON topic (you apologized: this is OT, so I will cease and desist) , presuming that the topic is foreign affairs. Moore can't go on Charlie Rose and ridicule the president's reactions to an attack by foreign terrorists (never mind foreign sovereign nations who harbor them) without addressing foreign affairs, so I think he's fair game. Some people aren't pleased at all: heraldtribune.com Moore's little diatribe may soon become more difficult to disseminate owing to the law of unintended consequences, however. hillnews.com Perhaps he should purchase a manure spreader. Actually, if I could pay in cowflops I'd be overpaying. I started to watch "Bowling for Columbine" a couple of weeks ago for free, and had to stop before I blew a gasket. Moore opens that one with a scene wherein he obtains a rifle by making a deposit in a bank. His obvious implication is that there is something criminal about a perfectly legitimate marketing scheme. I suppose he'd be OK if the bank lady gave him a toaster instead. Moore goes around with his scruffy beard and ball cap trying to give the impression that he's an average joe redneck, when in fact he's just plain red.