SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (52748)7/4/2004 9:04:40 AM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793707
 
I remember Buchanan's comments. I don't know what that has to do with the question at hand.

What it is has to do, is that no public figure can pretend that he doesn't know that proclaiming that the Jews in the US Government are running US Policy for Israel's interests instead of the US' is very sensitive, to say the least, and will widely be considered anti-Semitic, the old charges of dual loyalty and shadowy cabals playing straight into the memes from the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

You cannot say stuff like this - especially using words like 'puppeteer' and 'puppet' (with no evidence of course, there being none) and then cry innocently, "oh, I was only suggesting that the ties are a little bit too strong." If you really want to say that ties are too strong, you can say that, and just that, and criticize actual policies as put forward by actual politicians.

That Ralph Nader, per se, has not been known to say this before, is not an excuse. If he had made a slur against any other ethnic group, he would not get a 'first time free' pass on it.