To: jttmab who wrote (28005 ) 7/4/2004 1:49:15 PM From: Selectric II Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 93284 Considerably different than what you said, i.e., the "world's demands". How so?How many were actually hit? Name a police force that waits to disarm a gun-waiving felon taking pot-shots until after he fires and hits somebody.The Kurds who were living in an autonomous state...or are you talking about the Kurds that we turned a blind eye to because we thought it was a good thing that Iraq was fighting Iran? Does it matter who, if they were his victims?I suppose it's common sense that it contributed to the number of suicide bombers if you'll agree that you would commit suicide for $30,000. I, for one, never read any reports that the suicide bombers were influenced by money. Now that Saddam is gone and the $30K fee is out of the way, has there been a precipitous drop in suicide bombers? Oh, you're right. Saddam was just a misunderstood peace activist. Btw, do you think $30,000 might be an incentive in a country where per capita income is about $1,300 and life is perceived to have little value anyway? mfa.gov.il It's also a fact that members of the royal family continued to send funds to Al Queda. It's also a fact that the Saudi Royal family supported the religious schools in Saudi Arabia that taught so many Muslims to hate America. Do you think it was mere coincidence that 15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudis? No, it wasn't a coincidence. It's obvious that the Saudi Royal Family planned, financed, recruited, selected, and trained the 9/11 terrorists, then tried to pin the blame on that peace-lover OBL. Their undoing was that they used 15 Saudi's, and you figured out the connection, jttmab, blowing their cover. They should have hired Palestinians, who we know are all terrorists, because 100% of the suicide bombers in Israel are Palestinians. Right?