Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : TRIAL OF SADDAM HUSSEIN -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: marek_wojna who wrote (349)	7/4/2004 9:26:19 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 493

I'm trying to decide on one of to alternatives: You're on drugs. You need drugs. I'll get back to you when I decide which it is. Maybe. Kinda useless in either case.

To: marek_wojna who wrote (349)	7/5/2004 1:20:52 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 493

about 30 times longer than ours SH took power in 1968. That means that constitution cannot be more than 35 years old- -about 1/6 the US constitution. As to agoe of the civilization, then I guss we should all be Chinese Communists. Chinese civilization outranks the rest in age. Iraq did not, there is no legitimate government or house of commons to rewrite the constitution of Iraq, Iraqis are by law binded to the existing one, they are still at the stage of war with the occupants. Milosovic's Yugoslav gov't never officially surrendered either. Does that make his war crimes trial illegitimate? What of Ceausecue of Romania? Since he never surrendered, should his country still be governed by that scrap of paper? Harold never surrenederd to the Normans. Does that mean England should be given back to the pure-blooded Saxons? (If you can find any.) BTW, I did not found anything in your link to the Guardian about TV Al-Jazeera live coverage. And you found nothing otherwise either. slate.msn.com Why recently everything regarding President Saddam have to go through the criminal bush censorship before released? Prove it is. You made the claim; now back it. He also said the "the criminal is Bush"/i> BFD. Hitler said Churchill and the British gov't were criminals for bombing Germany from the air. So what? Easy excuse. If you wish to confuse fact and excuse, that's you're problem. But what about all American soldiers sent to death in the war in Vietnam while administration was doing everything possible to lose this war? So are you trying to set a new record for stupidest statement in the history of SI? You may have made it. . I'm sure it never even crossed your mind which lab. of CIA developed crack cocaine. I'll bite. Which one? And, BTW, I expect you to back it. Guantamo Bay POW and civilians hold against every international law. Yeah, the Admonistration overstepped its bounds and got slapped down by the Supreme Court. That's the way it's supposed to work. There has never been an administration that as NOT lost cases in the Supreme Court. PS. I had in my mind the count of victims on both sides due to the use of orange agent Produce your count. And then back it up. Your "reliability" as a source has alrady been demonstrated.