Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stockman_scott who wrote (50369)	7/6/2004 8:59:53 AM
From: Mannie	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 89467

Remember Bush saying he didn't read newspapers because he has the best people in the world telling him what was going on each day? What a chump. July 6, 2004, 6:15AM CIA withheld info about Iraqi weapons from Bush By JAMES RISEN New York Times WASHINGTON -- The CIA was told by relatives of Iraqi scientists before the war that Baghdad's programs to develop unconventional weapons had been abandoned, but the CIA failed to give that information to President Bush, even as he publicly warned of the threat posed by Saddam Hussein's illicit weapons, according to government officials. The existence of a secret prewar CIA operation to debrief relatives of Iraqi scientists -- and the agency's failure to give their statements to the president -- has been uncovered by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. The panel has been investigating the government's handling of prewar intelligence on Iraq's unconventional weapons and plans to release a report this week on the first phase of its inquiry. The report is expected to contain a scathing indictment of the CIA and its leaders for failing to recognize that the evidence they had collected did not justify their assessment that Saddam had illicit weapons. CIA officials, saying that only a handful of relatives made claims that the weapons programs were dead, play down the significance of the information collected in the secret debriefing operation. That operation is one of a number of significant disclosures by the Senate investigation. The Senate report, intelligence officials say, concludes that the agency and the intelligence community did a poor job of collecting information about the status of Iraq's weapons programs, and that analysts at the CIA and other intelligence agencies did an even worse job of writing reports that accurately reflected the information they had. Among the many problems that contributed to the committee's harsh assessment of the CIA's prewar performance were instances in which analysts may have misrepresented information, writing reports that distorted evidence in order to bolster their case that Iraq did have chemical, biological and nuclear programs, according to government officials. The Senate found, for example, that an Iraqi defector who supposedly provided evidence of the existence of a biological weapons program had actually said that he did not know of any such program. In another case concerning whether a shipment of aluminum tubes seized on its way to Iraq was evidence that Baghdad was trying to build a nuclear bomb, the Senate panel raised questions about whether the CIA had become an advocate, rather than an objective observer, and selectively sought to prove that the tubes were for a nuclear weapons program. While the Senate panel has concluded that CIA analysts and other intelligence officials overstated the case that Iraq had illicit weapons, the committee has not found any evidence that the analysts changed their reports as a result of political pressure from the White House, according to officials. The Senate report is expected to criticize both the director of central intelligence, George Tenet, and his deputy, John McLaughlin, and other senior CIA officials, for the way they managed the agency. Tenet has announced his resignation, effective July 11, and McLaughlin will serve as acting director until a permanent director is appointed. The CIA has scheduled a farewell ceremony for Tenet on Thursday, just as reverberations from the report are hitting the agency. The possibility that Tenet personally overstated the evidence has been investigated by the Senate panel, officials said. He was interviewed privately by the panel, and was asked whether he told Bush that the case for the existence of Iraq's unconventional weapons was a "slam dunk." In his book Plan of Attack, about the Bush administration's planning for the war in Iraq, Bob Woodward reported that Tenet reassured Bush about the evidence of the existence of Iraq's illicit weapons after Bush had made clear he was unimpressed by the evidence presented to him in a December 2002 briefing by McLaughlin. "It's a slam-dunk case!" Tenet is quoted as telling the president. In his interview with the Senate panel, Tenet refused to say whether he had used the "slam-dunk" phrase, officials said. In hindsight, the Senate panel and many other intelligence officials now agree that there was little effort within the U.S. intelligence community before the war to question the basic assumption that Saddam was still seeking to produce illicit weapons. Evidence that fit that assumption was embraced; evidence to the contrary was ignored or seen as part of a clever Iraqi disinformation campaign. Yet there were some people inside the intelligence community who recognized the need for better evidence. In 1998, the United Nations withdrew its weapons inspectors from Iraq, severely hampering the CIA's ability to monitor Iraqi weapons efforts. Charlie Allen, the agency's assistant director for collection, began searching for new sources of information. He pushed for several new collection programs, including one that called for approaching members of the families of Iraqi scientists believed to be involved in secret weapons programs, the officials said. Beginning in 2000, the relatives told the agency that the scientists had said that they were no longer working on illicit weapons, and that those programs were dead.