Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DizzyG who wrote (588293)	7/6/2004 6:09:37 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Alas, what you are lacking, is proof. You are attempting to argue your point based on 2 false premises: Your attempt to out think me is not working. 1. You are attempting to make the claim the President Bush is NOT doing his job. You lack proof because this is simply your opinion. It is not my opinion. I have repeated ad nauseum why I am not releasing my source. 2. You are attempting to build your case by speaking for the founding fathers. Sorry, but they are not here to express their opinions. Unfortunately for you, you are NOT are not an unbiased surrogate to speak in their behalf. Dude, do you really think the FF thought a president would be on holiday 42% of the year? They had just fought a major war with the Brits to get their independence. I am sure they did not expect that a president would be a slacker. You just posted an article that made the claim from CBS. You'll note that when I posted that article that I pointed out that the figures given by CBS were not made part of the article. CBS does not know EXACTLY what the President does on a daily basis, nor do you. As to this: I see......when they show Bush up in Maine playing with a segway, he's really working. If you believe that $h*t, then I have a freeway in LA to sell you.....dirt cheap. Are you losing it? I guess I should have expected this from you. When you are losing an argument, you switch to ad hominum attacks. If that makes you feel better, go for it. However, it does not strengthen your argument. I said that because you are making less and less sense. I can't keep going over the same issue when you refuse to read and digest the info I am providing. Time after time, the facts keep saying this president is a liar, incompetent and derelict, and you all keep denying it. The pox is on your house, not mine. No, you are attempting to distort facts. You have injected your opinion into the facts and have made an interpretation to further your political agenda. Facts stand by themselves without interpretation. You can't distort facts....the facts are the facts. I guess I should have expected this though: Apparently........he was in the Oval Office when it happened. Haven't you ever gotten a BJ at the office? Most work places allow you to have a break......besides, how long does a BJ at work take More moral equivalency from the left. Don't preach to me about moral equiavlency, or do you think the left are the only ones who get BJs in the office? Check it out: bartcop.com