Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DizzyG who wrote (588313)	7/6/2004 7:51:36 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 769670

And I am supposed to believe you? No, you don't have to do anything. It is not my opinion. I have repeated ad nauseum why I am not releasing my source. That's not going to work with me. Where's Bill? Produce proof or take your flogging like a grown-up. Flogging? What are you, a perv? ;~) You continue with: Dude, do you really think the FF thought a president would be on holiday 42% of the year? They had just fought a major war with the Brits to get their independence. I am sure they did not expect that a president would be a slacker. I can't say because I don't presume to speak for the FF. Alas, you do. That's the problem with your argument. You do understand the concept of logic, don't you? Its not logical to think that the FF expected a president to be off on vacation for 42% of the year. I see......when they show Bush up in Maine playing with a segway, he's really working. If you believe that $h*t, then I have a freeway in LA to sell you.....dirt cheap. I see...so you have now appointed yourself as the moral authority with respect to the daily activities of the President. Sorry, but I, for one, question your authority. You do that.......but its also my money that helps pay his salary. This is funny, too: I can't keep going over the same issue when you refuse to read and digest the info I am providing. You've provided nothing but smug commentary. Nice try... Oh oh.......smug? And I thought I was being honest with you. You can't distort facts....the facts are the facts. Let me rephrase then...you are attempting to juxtapose unrelated facts and then make distorted commentary that does not necessarily follow the facts. Kinda like M.Moore, huh? You would like to think that that kind of contemptuous statement still has impact. However, that ploy like many others has been overused by the right. In other words, we're onto your game. You close with: Don't preach to me about moral equiavlency, or do you think the left are the only ones who get BJs in the office? Check it out: And then you provide me with a link to a radio station. Ah, there's a valuable link. Clearly, this is a reliable source. Can I count on your alleged "link" about the president's vacation coming from a similar source? To a radio station? You need to try that link again.......or your mouse is screwing with you.