Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (139060)	7/7/2004 10:15:20 AM
From: Sun Tzu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

I think it sounds like Cheney didn't want to look at what the panel knows but was guessing (more like wishful thinking).

To: Neocon who wrote (139060)	7/7/2004 12:29:36 PM
From: cnyndwllr	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

It sounds like the panel doesn't know what Cheney knows, but is guessing. Anyone can cleverly say; "they may not know what I know." That always leaves an out for those who have no good answer. What is more difficult to advance is the reason for Cheney to "keep secrets" from the independent panel that's spending millions of dollars and tens of thousands of man hours to try to understand and address the means, reasons and lessons to be learned from 9/11. "Neener, neener, YOU CAN'T PROVE IT," on Cheney's part just doesn't get it when it's critical for the INTERESTS OF AMERICA that all the information be submitted, analyzed and acted upon. You surely aren't advocating a position where the partisan interests of the Bush/Cheney election efforts are considered paramount to the security interests of all Americans? Based on past actions, I can conceive of Cheney holding that belief, but why would any thinking American buy into that?