SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Suma who wrote (139064)7/7/2004 9:21:55 AM
From: Bill  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
<< and the 9/11 PANEL today again reiterated.... that there was ABSOLUTLEY NO CONNECTION BETWEEN AL QUIDA and IRAQ. >>

Can't find that one today... do you have a link?



To: Suma who wrote (139064)7/7/2004 10:28:43 AM
From: Sun Tzu  Respond to of 281500
 
>> The Pentagon was so well prepared and eager to try the new weapons that methinks that the President may not have had a choice but to go to war.

Please don't give the Neocons another silly defense of Bush...I can see this now, "Bush wanted more time but the evil DoD wanted to have its war anyway".

Yes the effect fallows the cause, but just because the dog chases the rabbit, it does not mean Dog was the cause of Rabbit.



To: Suma who wrote (139064)7/7/2004 1:33:09 PM
From: KLP  Respond to of 281500
 
Your conclusion was not correct. Go to google news, insert 9-11 commission and you will see the appropriate words are: "no collaborative links"......That does NOT mean there were NO Links....because the commission itself will show there were links.... but to date, they have found none to be "collaborative"..........

Evidently there is some sort of new evidence that came in during the last 3 weeks they are reviewing as well.