SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JohnM who wrote (53194)7/7/2004 11:34:44 AM
From: michael97123  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793731
 
What i mean is that the left will support moore, nadir, chumpsky, palestinian terrorists, moveon.org etc and ignore their anti semitism because of their aims and goals.. They did that with stalin as well. The nazis and fascists didnt get this free pass. So there is a distinction being made based on motives on whether something said or someone is anti semetic or not. If Hitler used suicide bomb tactics, it would never be called a war of liberation. When Buchanan railed against the "amen corner" the left happily took him on. But when virtually the same words are uttered by moveon.org, they get a free pass. WHY?



To: JohnM who wrote (53194)7/7/2004 11:48:11 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793731
 
And I'm certain someone who knows the history of anti-semitism well could make the case that it is no respector of the French Revolution right/left distinctions.

It is no respecter of political position, that's for sure. I posted an article yesterday by a Frenchwomen who makes a very good case that the French government made a deliberate decision in the 70's to side with the Arabs. They are now reaping the results of that effort.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News