Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (139132)	7/7/2004 9:11:37 PM
From: Sun Tzu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

The same intel that failed to check if the people mentioned in the document were actually in the office at the time of the alleged sale...or are you refering to the intel report that turned out to be a plagerization of an out of date master student report? With such intel and "intent" as the basis, I can prove that the pharmacy down the street wants to sell prozac without prescription and I should kill him before he turns into another Pablo Escobar.

To: Neocon who wrote (139132)	7/7/2004 9:25:39 PM
From: GST	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

<If, as intelligence reported> You mean the forged uranium documents? Now where do you suppose forged those documents (the ones you refer to as "intelligence") why were they prepared and distributed? Hmmmm. Who would want to make it look like SH was try to buy uranium? Hmmmm. Who would break into an embassy, steal letterhead and try to pass of the letters as authentic? Hmmmm. Who would do something so calculated to make SH look like a threat to the United States? Hmmmm. Who would try to draw attention to these documents and give them an air of "truth" and use them as "intelligence" for speeches from the White House? Hmmmm. Anybody you can think of?