SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (53245)7/7/2004 5:55:21 PM
From: Ilaine  Respond to of 793912
 
You recently posted about serving on a jury trial, and being amazed at how different you were from some of the other jurors. That's the way juries go.

There are "bleeding hearts" and there are "hard-asses." The received wisdom is that Blacks and Hispanics are more generous, on average, while Asians more likely to find for the defense. Plaintiff's don't want young women if the plaintiff is a woman, or the defendant is a young man or a sexy man.

True or not, the defense lawyers ALWAYS strike blacks and Hispanics.

For big cases, the lawyers get specialists to help them pick. To get around that, the courts don't give you the jury panel until a day or two before trial. So the really big firms research the entire pool.

Too rich for my blood. I pick jurors based on how they look at me, how they make eye contact. If they look mad, or off kilter, or unhappy to be there, I don't want them on the jury. I ALWAYS strike jurors who give me the hairy eyeball, regardless of race, creed or color.