Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (53277)	7/7/2004 9:09:14 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793743

So, karen, if members of the Bush administration were to call Kerry a French Socialist or a German Christian Democrat, that would be fine and dandy, no slur about 'whose interests is he really working for' intended? What does it mean to assign an American official a place in an Israeli administration/political spectrum? Besides which, those who bring up this trope are not particularly shy about pounding the 'he's really working for Israel' point home. To quote the esteemed Senator Hollings: Israel long since would have taken us to the weapons of mass destruction if there were any or if they had been removed. With Iraq no threat, why invade a sovereign country? The answer: President Bush's policy to secure Israel. Led by Wolfowitz, Richard Perle and Charles Krauthammer, for years there has been a domino school of thought that the way to guarantee Israel's security is to spread democracy in the area Get that? Israel knew that Saddam was no threat (the Mossad knows everything, right? would that our CIA enjoyed such a reputation), so Bush knew, but Wolfowitz, Perle and Krauthammer turned on the Jew-beams and dragged America into a perfectly unnecessary war purely to safeguard Israel. We pay, they gain.