SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JohnM who wrote (53285)7/7/2004 9:49:01 PM
From: michael97123  Respond to of 793755
 
"After all the stuff thrown at the Clintons, I can't get worked up about complaints about Moore. "

Huh. Thats just a retarded statement. A conservative once said, "After all the stuff thrown at the Reagans, i just cant get worked up about Falwell." HUH!
What are you trying to say John. Because clinton was attacked the attack on Moore cant be right or fair or what. Are you a professor or an undergrad? Mike



To: JohnM who wrote (53285)7/7/2004 11:44:52 PM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793755
 
<font color=blue>"Is it going to give the Bush folk some problems during the election? I certainly hope so."<font color=black>

Hmmmmm.... An academic who has no problems with Michael
Moore's, 'Fahrenheit 9/11', a so called "documentary"
where Moore who makes no attempt at factually or
accurately documenting the subject matter.

In fact it is intentionally full of half truths &
regularly presents a one sided POV to the complete
exclusion of an objective reporting of the facts necessary
in a serious documentary. Heck, this so called "documentary"
is repeatedly discredited by multiple sources & all manner
of credible evidence for the genuine sham it is. Credible
journalists & other experts establish this "documentary"
is replete with false, deceptive, distorted & misleading
information & it bothers you not one wit.

This so called "documentary" is intentionally released
during a Presidential election cycle with the intent of
swaying voters opinions, again to no chagrin whatsoever
form you, a socially conscious, very PC academic.

I guess as long as your side wins, how it happens isn't
important, 'eh?