Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neeka who wrote (588841)	7/8/2004 12:41:33 PM
From: steve dietrich	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

The sad part about it, is that the poor Republican stooge, that votes against his economic self interest, never receives the promised social moral promises, made by the party. But then if they actually delivered, they would end losing the Republican of modest means.

To: Neeka who wrote (588841)	7/8/2004 10:37:09 PM
From: J_F_Shepard	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 769670

re;"rich=being very productive and therefore financially profitable" Wow...that's a pretty loose definition, care to be more specific...?? re:"For a century, the left has largely failed to enact its agenda for redistributing wealth." I can see you've never noticed it, but both political parties have redistribution of wealth as their particular agendas, ie to support their constituents. Most recently, Bush got a huge tax cut that favored the rich. If the Dems get back in , look for benefits for the lower end of the income spectrum. What's so amazing to me is that ordinary middle income people, perhaps like yourself, delude themselves into believing that they are part of the republican upper class and will share in Republican largesse.