SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe NYC who wrote (193630)7/8/2004 3:51:45 PM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573306
 
re: And the bar for reasonable doubt keeps being raised higher and higher (or should I say lower and lower?)

The bar for reasonable doubt hasn't changed. But you seem to want to raise it in criminal cases but in civil cases you want a higher burden of proof. Is that it?

John



To: Joe NYC who wrote (193630)7/8/2004 4:34:49 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Respond to of 1573306
 
Joe, And the bar for reasonable doubt keeps being raised higher and higher (or should I say lower and lower?)

Hey, just look at the last lawyer who became president and how he squirmed his way out of perjury:

"Oral sex really isn't sex."

"It all depends on what your definition of 'is' is."

Of course, it's all the fault of the "vast right-wing conspiracy" for making Clinton do what he did. Uh huh.

Tenchusatsu


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News