Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (53446)	7/8/2004 4:46:28 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793756

Not for the sake of Israel. For the sake of reelection. Ah, yes, that's why Bush went along with Wolfowitz, Perle and Krauthammer when they turned on the Jew-beams. But what is their motivation supposed to be?

To: Lane3 who wrote (53446)	7/8/2004 5:26:49 PM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793756

"Every president since 1947 has made a futile attempt to help Israel negotiate peace. But no leadership has surfaced amongst the Palestinians that can make a binding agreement. President Bush realized his chances at negotiation were no better. He came to office imbued with one thought -- re-election. Bush felt tax cuts would hold his crowd together and spreading democracy in the Mideast to secure Israel would take the Jewish vote from the Democrats. " If this is all that Hollins said , i have no problem. It is purely a political statement. It may even be right as far as bush political strategy goes. It is only critical of bush and if things had gone better in iraq, he would have gotten a bigger chunk of the jewish vote than he now will, although he has made some inroads. And it says he couldnt make peace with the pals to get the jewish vote not because jews suck or are likudniks and greater israel guys, or disloyal but because of a lack of real pal leadership. Mike