Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: carranza2 who wrote (139493)	7/8/2004 9:45:07 PM
From: epicure	Respond to of 281500

That was in the context of comparing it to Germany- I was saying that EVEN if we let Iraq keep Kuwait it wouldn't have been WWII Germany. I wasn't arguing we should have let them have Kuwait. I would have thought that was obvious- but apparently not. I am on record supporting the UN push to get Saddam out of Kuwait, always, in every post I have ever written on the subject. You will never find a post by me not in favor of that action. When countries are invaded I support multilateral action to preserve the sovereignty of the attacked country, even if that country is a little despotic kingdom like Kuwait. I think the US aggression against Iraq was wrong for the same reason Saddam's action against Kuwait was wrong (and China's action against Tibet, and so on).