Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Piffer Thread on Political Rantings and Ravings -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E who wrote (14196)	7/9/2004 3:08:45 PM
From: mph	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14610

Either the Democrats gratuitously objected to Denson's talk (where is it? Why haven't the Republicans published the text?) or they had reason. What I found about Denson indicates to me that the choice of him was made in the interest of Republican partisan politics. I sincerely hope for the sake of your clients you're only pretending not to comprehend that. To the contrary, I perfectly comprehend what you say you "found" and what that "indicated" to you. Of course, that's your opinion as opposed to some undeniable truth as to the basis for the conclusions you reached or the "facts" you inferred. Your opinions come across loud and clear. But that doesn't make them correct. Maybe you should contemplate that. As for hypotheticals, yours are incomplete. In order to make a valid comparison, you'd have to have all the facts surrounding the Denton situation (which you admit that you don't although you're wont to fill in the blanks with assumptions). Once you have all the facts, then perhaps you could construct a complete hypothetical involving Wesley Clark. I'll look forward to that. As for your reference to Wesley Clark. Didn't you change it to Clark from Moore after you read my response? If I am incorrect about that, I apologize in advance. In general, I wasn't defending the Republicans or castigating the Democrats over this situation. I was mostly curious as to where you were coming from in making the statements you made. Since your arguments devolved into petty ad hominems, I won't bother with you further..............