Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : 5spl -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (1539)	7/9/2004 8:28:06 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2534

If he did nothing more then wear the mask in the store it would be the trigger happy store owner who bears the responsibility for putting the others in the store at risk BS a thief or worse is what the store owner is thinking......obviously his intent was to f*** with the store owner's head... only the store owner doesn't really know he's just playing an ill conceived little mind game now does he? it's the store owner's responsibility to protect himself and his business, not play stupid mind games with some guy who apparently doesn't know his ass from a hole in the ground as far as the specific laws precluding entering with your face covered...well yeah....i'm guessing that's why they went on the technicality of a "terrorist threat" look, all i'm saying is if you come walking into my establishment with a ski mask or any other kind of mask, be prepared for the potential consequences.... like i said, the jerk is lucky to be alive and if sending his sorry little self to prison for a year deters others from the same kind of "prank"...(and potentially saving lives) i'm all for it