Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: elpolvo who wrote (50729)	7/10/2004 10:38:24 AM
From: Suma	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 89467

Rush to Judgement.... Rush to war.... Both (Simpson case ) and this newest case will probably receive the same verdict. NOT GUILTY.

To: elpolvo who wrote (50729)	7/10/2004 10:44:17 AM
From: stockman_scott	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 89467

As Rationales for War Erode, Issue of Blame Looms Large ___________________________________ By Dana Milbank and Walter Pincus Washington Post Staff Writers Saturday, July 10, 2004; Page A01 washingtonpost.com <<...Yesterday's report by the Senate intelligence committee left in shreds two of the Bush administration's main rationales for the war in Iraq: that Iraq had illicit weapons and that it cooperated with al Qaeda. The conclusions are not earthshaking by themselves. Although President Bush and Vice President Cheney have not abandoned either rationale, both were already tattered after similar doubts were voiced over many months by U.S. weapons inspectors in Iraq, the commission probing the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, CIA officials and others. The larger question is whether voters will blame the White House for these two massive mistakes...>>