SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: sea_biscuit who wrote (53714)7/10/2004 1:15:00 PM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793725
 
Afghanistan. That's where the 140,000 US troops should have been

That's how many would have been there if Gore had been Prez. We would have had an old fashion WWII with his Cabinet in charge.



To: sea_biscuit who wrote (53714)7/10/2004 2:32:33 PM
From: bela_ghoulashi  Respond to of 793725
 
Great id. It works.



To: sea_biscuit who wrote (53714)7/16/2004 2:12:02 AM
From: DavesM  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793725
 
Dippy,

Forgive me if I had asked this before, but how is the United States suppose to feed and supply 140,000 troops in Afghanistan? For that matter, how would the U.S. send a 140,000 troops (with tanks, helicopters, ect...) to Afghanistan?

re: "Do you know that Spain has actually increased its troop count? Guess where? Afghanistan. That's where the 140,000 US troops should have been."