Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (34925)	7/11/2004 2:39:49 PM
From: ChinuSFO	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

Lord Butler's report is not out yet. Don't know anything about the post, its link, where the writer got the contents of the report etc. But notice that in the following post, the British intelligence community did not agree with the US intelligence report. That opens up a whole new question. Why was there disagreement between the two intelligence communities? Was the US intelligence report one based on real intelligence or was it doctored to suit the wishes of somebody (thank you Mr. Oneil for what you said in your book) Anyway, here is the post and decide for yourself why there was disagreement between the intelligence communities of the two nations. <font size=3> British spies disown Saddam weapons claims By Peter Fray, Herald Correspondent in London July 12, 2004 British spies have reportedly disowned the intelligence that underpinned the prewar claims of the Prime Minister, Tony Blair, that Saddam Hussein presented a serious threat and had to be deposed. The claims come just days before a report on the reliability of Britain's prewar intelligence is published, and as fresh claims emerge that Mr Blair considered quitting politics last month. Several cabinet ministers and Mr Blair's wife, Cherie, were instrumental in talking him out of quitting under pressure of a fall in Labour's support, mainly due to his handling of Iraq. Mr Blair, now into his eighth year in office, has faced constant criticism over the war and speculation that his Chancellor, Gordon Brown, will move against him. Labour faces a battle to hold on to two supposedly safe seats in by-elections in the Midlands on Thursday, the day after the publication of the Butler inquiry into prewar intelligence. According to a poll in the Mail on Sunday yesterday, more than half of voters believe Mr Blair should resign if the inquiry finds he lied about Iraq's weapons. In a move to blunt the political fallout from the report, Mr Blair admitted recently that Saddam's weapons might never be found. He is expected to use the publication of the report to draw a line under controversy over Iraq. A Labour source said voters wanted to move on from the war and its damaging aftermath. <font color=red>But claims that senior spies have taken the unusual step of withdrawing intelligence advice because it was found to be incorrect will add to the pressure on Mr Blair. They were due to be aired last night on the BBC TV program Panorama. <font color=black>Mr Blair claimed in the foreword to the Government's September 2002 dossier that assessed intelligence that it had established beyond all doubt that Saddam had continued to produce banned weapons. Mr Blair will come under pressure to say when he became aware that the intelligence used to justify the invasion of Iraq was considered unreliable by agencies. The Butler report is expected to focus on the role played by senior Blair staff in preparing and changing the dossier that included the discredited claim that Saddam could deploy weapons within 45 minutes. Mr Blair's chief of staff, Jonathan Powell, and his former director of communications Alastair Campbell are likely to be cited as exercising undue influence over the dossier written by John Scarlett, then head of the supreme spy body, the Joint Intelligence Committee. This committee is supposed to provide independent, non-political intelligence advice to the Government. The inquiry has reportedly seen minutes of a March 2002 meeting in Downing Street during which senior officials discussed how the available intelligence was not strong enough to support invading Iraq. The meeting, reported by the Financial Times, took place six months before the release of the September dossier in which Mr Blair claimed that Saddam was a serious and current threat. Mr Scarlett has since been promoted to head the spy agency MI6. <font color=red>A former head of the Joint Intelligence Committee, Dame Pauline Neville-Jones, has said that responsibility for intelligence failings and their use must rest with Mr Blair. But she also suggested that Mr Scarlett should step down from his MI6 post if the Butler report criticised him. <font color=black>Mr Blair has constantly defended the invasion of Iraq as the correct and moral action and insists that Saddam was a threat, even though all efforts have failed to uncover evidence to confirm the claims of weapons stockpiles. A Downing Street spokeswoman said Mr Blair would not comment on the Butler report in advance of its publication. She insisted that Mr Blair had no intention of leaving politics in the near future. smh.com.au