Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Ask God -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: alan w who wrote (37998)	7/11/2004 8:14:51 PM
From: Berry Picker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 39621

Good Grief Alan - can you not see that Heb 9:26 plainly teaches that when Jesus appeared it was the 'end of the ages' not some prediction of ages yet to come? There was but one age to come - the New Covenant Age. Also in verse 28 it says He bore the sins of "many" not All. A verse that contradicts your understanding of 1 Cor 15:22 Also confirmed by verses like these: Gal 4:4 when the fullness of the time had come, God sent forth His Son, born of a woman, born under the law, Hebrews 1:2 has in these last days spoken to us by His Son, whom He has appointed heir of all things, through whom also He made the worlds; Spoken to us is past tense - in these last days is present not future tense - these verses conclude that all other ages ended with Christ bringing in the New Age in His New Covenant. The covenants are the ages - the eons are not marked simply by time period on some galactic calendar abstract from God's works of redemption toward men that He has predestined to such. The bible is about the Gospel - the eons are related to God's works or covenants. Separating those covenants from the eons may be good debate but very poor biblical interpretation. What do you think constitutes the eons if not covenants?