SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (50861)7/12/2004 4:17:59 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
Sorry...the FLA Supremes do not get the final say on US Constitutional issues nor on federal statutes.....that's the job of the USSC which decided the FLA decison was made in error......that's the way the system works, ergo, Bush was duly elected.....under the rule of law.....

Antidemocratic types like yourself find this hard to deal with...I understand.....but those ARE the facts.....



To: Road Walker who wrote (50861)7/12/2004 4:20:08 PM
From: longnshort  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 89467
 
John, the Fla, Supremes were not treating all the ballots with' EQUAL justice under the Law" that's why the USSC had to step in. If the Fla. Supremes said some floridians could be enslaved, should the USSC step in????



To: Road Walker who wrote (50861)7/12/2004 5:06:56 PM
From: Skywatcher  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 89467
 
The word is APPOINTED....he probably has to look that one up
CC


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News