Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Selectric II who wrote (50905)	7/12/2004 8:53:54 PM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 89467

re: But that's just a biased, political analysis of the decision, right? No, that's a legal scholars opinion. The scholarly opinions vary from this was the US Supreme Courts darkest moment, to "what else could they do?". But almost everyone agrees it was a pragmatic, not a legal decision. That there was little or no legal justifaction for the US Supreme Court to even be involved. Take that anyway you want... the conversation is getting old. But "duly elected" is certainly a stretch. Bush is the least "duly elected" President in American history. By anyone's measurement. John