Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (590153)	7/12/2004 10:45:15 PM
From: Srexley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

" I did ask you, however, why you thought terrorists or Saddam would attack us. I told you when asked who would attack us that terrorists would. They would do it for the same reasons they used when they attacked us on 9-11-01. They have declared war on us, and it is pretty obvious to most people. I never said Saddam would attack us (nor do I think you asked me). If you did, now you know my answer. Now answer my question. It was not convaluted at all. You indicated that paying terrorist's families $25,000 was not supporting terrorist. I then asked you if you thought it opposed terrorism, or was neutral to terrorism. It is a simple question that I have asked so I could be clear on your position as to what paying terrorists families meant in way of support. A one word answer would do. But I do not expect you to answer. Surprise me.