To: Don Earl who wrote (7262 ) 7/13/2004 2:49:43 PM From: sea_urchin Respond to of 20039 Don > It's pretty obvious from the PNAC roster that we're looking at like minded criminals, banded together to advance a mutually agreed upon agenda. No doubt about that > It's equally obvious that there is a relationship between Bush being appointed President, and Bush then appointing everyone from PNAC to positions of power in his administration. I don't know how the system works so I can't agree or disagree? But as I saw it, after Rumsfeld, the whole Pentagon crew seemed to be "automatic" choices. I always felt they would have been there for any GOP President because most of them were there under Reagan and Bush1. In fact, it is my distinct impression that the neocons had been slowly taking over the Pentagon and foreign policy positions to the extent one might say they brought about a tacit coup d'etat . > Is Bush a pet poodle, trained to do tricks for the public, thus keeping the spotlight off the dark corners where his Crime Family operates? I can see you regard W, and his family, as central to everything which has occurred. I have always believed W was incidental and if not him then someone else could have done what he had to do eg McCain. > Is there any question Bush was in the loop from beginning to end, and received the necessary backing to be appointed President on the condition he pull the trigger? None whatsoever, or he wouldn't have hired the PNAC terrorist organization to make it happen. As I see it, the PNAC terrorist organization hired W. > There have been questions at times related to my choice of the term "Mastermind" to describe Bush. The masterminding and execution of 9/11 could more accurately be attributed to the work of a think tank made up of members of PNAC, Unquestionably. > It might be more appropriate to describe Bush as the hired assassin of 9/11, That's the way I see it. > the bottom line is if Bush is taken down for pulling the trigger, his brain goes down with him, even if the brain belongs to someone else. He might be the "fall guy" and the "brain" gets away. In fact, I have often thought that W might have been blackmailed to act in the puppet way he has. It would have been very easy for an occult organization like MOSSAD to "get stuff" on him and then use it to suit whatever agenda they had in mind. In this regard, Ariel Sharon could easily have been the Godfather although I actually believe he is also dancing to someone else's tune. > The part I can't figure out is why none of the activists aligned to break up the Bush Crime Family have taken the approach of using the Patriot Act to go after PNAC as a terrorist organization. I believe the PNAC are "sacred" and no-one can touch them. To my mind, the "Prince of Darkness", Richard Perle, is more powerful than King George II. > The "New Pearl Harbor" statement should make prosecuting PNAC under the Patriot Act a slam dunk. But they will not be prosecuted. Indeed, if they are that will immediately demonstrate that the real power does not lie with them and vice versa . > Not to mention all of the 9/11 "intelligence failures" can be traced straight to a Bush appointed member of PNAC. Sure. But I contend that was going to happen whether W was there or not. > In fact, virtually every single item described by the media in the past 3 years as an "intelligence failure" can be traced to PNAC. Clearly they ran the show. As I see it, they were de facto in charge. W did what they told him to do.