Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: nz_q who wrote (7298)	7/14/2004 1:31:02 PM
From: Sidney Reilly	Respond to of 20039

Who said remote controlling the 9-11 planes was not possible? Here's a system that can do it. "He was (is?) Corporate VP1 at System Planning Corporation, a major player in the "Homeland Security" industry. One of the products that SysPlan sells is the Command Transmitter Systems, a remote control system for planes, boats, missiles and other vehicles2 . It's highly customable and configurable to interface with an almost limitless number of vehicle types. The remote control theory of 9/11 looks a little better every day. Command Transmitter System System Planning Corproation's Command Transmitter Systems (CTS) provide remote control and flight termination functions through a fully-redundant self-contained solid-state system." aor.cat4.net "Also, System Planning Corporation markets the technology to take over the controls of an airborne vehicle already in flight. For example, the Flight Termination System technology could hijack hijackers and bring the plane down safely. The Flight Termination System can be used in conjunction with the CTS technology that can control up to 8 airborne vehicles simultaneously" thetruthseeker.co.uk That's my theory and it's easily doable. A knock out gas is released in the cockpit behind the locked door and the plane is remotely flown into the towers. They could even knock out everyone on the plane if they wanted to. I don't know if it was ever proven that people actually made cell calls from the planes or not.

To: nz_q who wrote (7298)	7/14/2004 3:18:49 PM
From: sea_urchin	Respond to of 20039

nz_q > I wonder if a preprogrammed flight path can be preloaded and activated remotely in flight. Could such a program also be designed so it can "lock out" any manual overrides? I know nothing about avionics but it does not seem to be beyond comprehension that the flight controls could be "captured" electronically, either before take-off or during flight, and the plane flown by remote control sianews.com >>The plane that hit the Pentagon approached or reached its actual physical limits, military personnel have calculated that the Pentagon plane pulled between five and seven g's in its final turn. The same is true for the second aircraft to impact the WTC. There is only one way this can happen. As well as fully autonomous flight capability, the 767 and 757 are the ONLY COMMUTER PLANES MADE BY BOEING THAT CAN BE FLOWN VIA REMOTE CONTROL. It is a feature that is standard to all of them, all 757's and 767's can do it. The purpose for this is if there is a problem with the pilots, Norad can fly the planes to safe destinations via remote. Only in this flight mode can those craft exceed their software limits and perform to their actual physical limits because a pre existing emergency situation is assumed if this mode of flight is used. Terrorists in fact did not fly those planes, it is totally and completely impossible for those planes to have been flown in such a manner from the cockpit. Those are commuter aircraft, not F-16's and their software knows it. <<