SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: longnshort who wrote (35403)7/14/2004 1:44:08 PM
From: ChinuSFORead Replies (2) | Respond to of 81568
 
Don't forget that this judge community that you talk about put Bush in the White House in 2000 "overruling the will of the people". Just 5 of them decided on the next President in 2000.



To: longnshort who wrote (35403)7/14/2004 2:29:13 PM
From: redfishRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568
 
So it would be a pre-emptive amendment? We would be amending the constitution for a problem that doesn't actually exist, but which someday may exist?



To: longnshort who wrote (35403)7/14/2004 4:59:14 PM
From: cirrusRead Replies (3) | Respond to of 81568
 
Who gives a rat's behind if gays marry? Is gay marriage going to increase the 47% divorce rate in heterosexual marriages? Are married guys going to suddenly start preferring guys to girls and leave their wives if a gay couple moves in next door? LOL!

What I don't understand about conservatives is the way they yap on and on about freedom and too much government interference in our lives - then scream about "liberal judges" who interpret the constitution in ways that expand individual freedoms. They then go so far as to demand constitutional amendments to empower even more government controls over the most private of human affairs.

this country is going to hell in a hand basket because of radical liberal judges, one judge can over rule 50 MILLION people, that's not what the Fathers had in Mind.