Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bentway who wrote (590758)	7/14/2004 6:06:14 PM
From: J.B.C.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Incorrect. Jim

To: bentway who wrote (590758)	7/14/2004 7:07:59 PM
From: Johannes Pilch	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

The point is, no MEN were required! Big deal. As I have said, the issue is not physical reproduction between men and women, but essential biological identity. Your biological existence, at its most fundamental level, is predicated upon and defined by the genome of exactly one male combined with that of exactly one female. This is genomic heterosexuality. That is what you are. Homosexuality is not found here. It is not you or anyone else. Like cloning, all the scientists here did was to copy heterosexuality, taking a maternal genetic imprint and marrying it with a paternal imprint to begin the developmental process. That is just heterosexuality refried, dontcha know? In the Time article (which you may purchase if you wish), the chief scientist himself declared with amazement that his experiment confirmed that human life is defined by the joining of male-female. time.com This entire experiment is absolutely predicated upon biological heterosexuality, not homosexuality. No matter how deeply you look, where humans are concerned, heterosexuality is our biological identity - not homosexuality. And you will never be able to escape this fact unless you escape yourself. What you must do is develop a human by taking a maternal genomic imprint and combining it with another maternal genomic imprint. That would be biological homosexuality. If you could do that, then you would possibly have something. But, of course you have nothing because such a creature emerging from this false union would be an utterly inhuman freak - as is homosexuality itself.