SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Israel to U.S. : Now Deal with Syria and Iran -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: steve kammerer who wrote (5472)7/15/2004 12:52:18 AM
From: Thomas M.  Respond to of 22250
 
<<< ... In April 1990, Saddam Hussein, then still George Bush's friend and ally, offered to destroy his chemical and biological weapons if Israel agreed to destroy its non-conventional weapons -- including its nuclear weapons. The State Department welcomed Hussein's offer to destroy his own arsenal, but rejected the link "to other issues or weapons systems." Note that these remain unspecified. Acknowledgement of the existence of Israeli nuclear weapons would raise the question why all U.S. aid to Israel is not illegal under congressional legislation of the 1970s that bars aid to any country engaged in clandestine nuclear weapons development ... >>>

chomsky.info

Tom



To: steve kammerer who wrote (5472)7/15/2004 1:00:44 AM
From: Thomas M.  Respond to of 22250
 
How Are the Mighty Fallen!

U.S. Ambassador to Israel Martin Indyk’s Lost (and Found) Security Clearance

By Andrew I. Killgore

Martin Indyk, America’s ambassador to Israel, is a Zionist. Israeli newspapers reported that Indyk declared himself such when he went to Israel in 1995 as the first American Jewish ambassador to the Jewish state.

Indyk’s security clearance was lifted by the State Department in September for “suspected violations” of security standards. Despite its restoration in October, a thousand questions arise—along with a sense of astonished awe that such a high-flying star in the Zionist apparat currently dominating Washington could fall to earth, even temporarily. Moreover, the post-restoration ambassador kept such a low profile at October’s Sharm el-Sheikh summit as to be virtually invisible.

[continued ...]

wrmea.com



To: steve kammerer who wrote (5472)7/15/2004 1:35:38 AM
From: Thomas M.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 22250
 
I like the sarcasm:

<<< ... Many Egyptians also expressed satisfaction when Scud missiles hit Israel. Lacking Western enlightenment, they find it hard to understand why it is highly meritorious to demolish Iraq because of its failure to withdraw from Kuwait under the U.S. terms of unconditional surrender, while it is a reversion to Nazism to administer to Israel what amounts to a slap on the wrist, in comparison, for ignoring the order of the U.N. Security Council to withdraw from Lebanon (March 1978, and subsequently) and other condemnations of its terrorism and repression. Backward cultures fail to see what is so obvious to us: orders to Iraq are to be obeyed; orders to Israel demonstrate the inveterate anti-Semitism of the world, and are therefore to be disregarded, just as World Court condemnations of the U.S. merely discredit this "hostile forum," as the New York Times and others explain ... >>>

chomsky.info