Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bentway who wrote (590824)	7/14/2004 7:46:41 PM
From: Johannes Pilch	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

Also, I disagree. I'd have to call this process homosexual reproduction, since only one sex is required. hehe. You may disagree, but the scientist who engineered the experiment disagrees with you and agrees with me. The material came from the bodies of females. But the material itself was of two sexual imprints. That makes it fundamental heterosexuality. You are just confused by the higher level non-essentials and trying to ignore the mathematically objective fact at the lowest, most essential level - where the genetic material actually meets. When we go right down to the lowest level of human existence, heterosexuality and not homosexuality is there - by default. This is true in all cases, whether natural or artificial. It is inescapable. Let's see you create a human with female genomic material and SIMULATED female genomic material. You can't, because such a thing is by definition foreign to human identity. Male and Female materials are required in all cases. It is objectively apparent that this is HETERO-sexuality. You lose - I win - as usual. (shrug)