Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (140461)	7/15/2004 5:04:43 PM
From: Kenya AA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Yes, but I assumed you were referring to Al Qaeda because that's been one of the Bush mantras for justification of invading Iraq.

To: Ilaine who wrote (140461)	7/15/2004 5:15:14 PM
From: Sun Tzu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

> You do realize that not all terrorists are Al Qaeda? You are of course correct on this point. What criteria do you think we should use for prioritizing the threat of various terrorist cells? Based on the carnage they have caused, the first is AQ, before that it was Oklahoma. What is more, those militia boys don't have long beards and dark skin to be easily distinguishable from the average citizen. On top of that, they actually know the country pretty damn well and know where to strike...but of course it seems that little petty groups in the Kurdish controlled Iraq are a higher priority than both AQ and internal cells.