Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (140513)	7/16/2004 7:40:51 AM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 281500

The choice is not between an infinite amount of trivia and such knowledge as may be useful. It is very useful to know, for example, that winners in geopolitics are not necessarily winners in the competition of cultures. For example, Rome coquered the Hellenistic world, but ended up admiring and emulating the Greeks. The Jews were the least among nations, but their religion became widely admired, attracting a lot of converts in the Mediterranean, and set up the basis for mass conversions to Christianity. The Teutonic tribes overran the Western Empire, but most of them ended up speaking a dialect of Latin, adopting Christianity, and aspiring to recreate the Empire. Similarly, the Mongols conquered the Chinese Empire, turned around, and became Chinese. If we prevail, it will be primarily because of the superiority of our civilization in satisfying human aspirations, not because of force of arms. Military strength is merely a way of steering between oppression and anarchy, to create the space where society can evolve.