SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mannie who wrote (51176)7/16/2004 12:27:32 PM
From: Skywatcher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
The Price of Imperial Folly
By Phyllis Bennis, AlterNet. Posted July 15, 2004.

Lost in the Beltway debate over intelligence failure is
the enormous price we – Americans, Iraqis, the world
– are paying for the Bush administration's
self-serving war.

The
recently
released
Senate
Intelligence
Report
demonstrates
what
so
many
have
known
for
so
long:
The
claimed
justifications
for
the
invasion
of
Iraq
were
based
on lies. But lost in the Beltway debate over intelligence failure is the enormous price we –
Americans, Iraqis, the world – are paying for the Bush administration's self-serving war.

In sheer dollar amounts, the costs of this precipitate war are already far higher than any
number put forward by Bush officials at the outset of the war. The price tag so far is $151
billion and climbing – already three times the initial estimate provided by Bush's Office of
Management and Budget and embarrassingly close to the "$100 to $200 billion" that White
House economic advisor Lawrence Lindsay anticipated just before he precipitously left the
administration in December 2002.

For most of us, $151 billion is an incomprehensible amount of money. It's hard to imagine
what that kind of dollar amount actually means. Well, here are some facts to prod our
imagination.

To begin with, $151 billion can pay for health care for 23 million uninsured Americans; or
housing stipends for 27 million homeless people in this country; or a year's salary for 3
million new elementary school teachers; or more than 678,000 new fire engines.

The international impact of that kind of money is even more breathtaking. That same $151
billion could feed half the hungry people in the world for two years and provide clean water
and sanitation for the entire developing world and fund a comprehensive global AIDS
program and pay for childhood immunizations for every child in poor countries that
constitute the global South.

The United States instead chose to invade Iraq to depose a tyrant who posed little danger
to the United States or to the world.

Startling as $151 billion may be, the costs of the war go far beyond direct economic costs.
Local communities across the nation have been affected by the loss of vitally needed
federal funds slashed to pay for war. But even more important, they have lost large
numbers of 'first responders' – the firefighters, police, ambulance drivers, emergency
medical technicians and others who provide crisis care – who are also disproportionately
members of the National Guard and the reserves. And with one-third of the entire U.S.
military deployment in Iraq made up of Guard and Reserve troops, basic emergency
services are facing serious consequences.

Among military families themselves, the impact of this war goes far beyond the fear of
death or injury of loved ones. Polls indicate that increasing numbers of military families are
facing a serious financial crisis including bankruptcy, unemployment and hunger. The
so-called "all-volunteer" army is a creation of the "poverty draft," made up
disproportionately of the poor and people of color.

The impact on these families is severe. Between 30 and 40 percent of reservists and
national guard members earn a lower salary during military deployment than at their
regular job at home. As a result, more military families are forced to turn to emergency food
support; one study reported a "several hundred percent" increase in requests for food
stamps and subsidized meals by military families between 2002 and 2003.

The future of these families looks just as grim because the U.S. military is overstretched
and long tours of duty are likely to remain the norm. While there is talk of reviving the legal
draft, even without such a move the pressure on members of the reserve and the National
Guard, and on regular troops whose contracts have expired but who are prohibited from
leaving the military, will continue to escalate.

The tally of expenses also grows ever longer when we consider the long-term effects of
the war. Environmental degradation from the estimated 1000 tons of depleted uranium
dropped by U.S. forces, almost three times the amount dropped in the 1991 Gulf War, will
certainly have its most damaging effects on Iraqis, especially children, as well as on U.S.
and coalition soldiers. The effects are also almost certain to spread beyond the borders to
surrounding countries, such as Iran and Kuwait, which share the Shaat al-Arab waterway
with Iraq.

The Iraq war's long-term impact on the rule of international law – already made evident by
the torture chambers of Abu Ghraib – is likely to be just as destructive. The U.S. decision to
go to war without UN approval and in violation of the UN Charter, its assertion of the
legitimacy of preventive war (especially one based on false claims), and its law-of-empire
style rejection of its obligations under the Geneva Conventions and the Convention
Against Torture, all set the stage for international lawlessness and escalating conflict. Be it
an Indian attack on Pakistan, a war between Peru and Colombia, or a new Israeli invasion
of Lebanon and Syria - in each of these scenarios, the offending nation could argue that
their actions have been "legalized" by the precedent set by the Bush administration.

The war has also, of course, transformed Iraq into what it never was under Saddam
Hussein – a haven and mobilizing point for international terrorism. According to the
prestigious International Institute of Strategic Studies in London, the primary effect of the
U.S. occupation on Al Qaeda has been "accelerated recruitment."

And in conclusion, let's not forget the most important cost of this war: the loss of human
life. U.S. and so-called "coalition" forces have lost over 1,000 soldiers, including 880 U.S.
troops. Thousands more have been wounded, many of them grievously so. Iraqi civilians
have lost more than ten times that number. While the Pentagon refuses on principle to
track Iraqi dead, the most recent estimates range from 11,164 to 13,118.

That the Iraq war has failed to accomplish its stated purposes is undeniable: Iraq is
neither sovereign nor free; The Middle East is no more democratic; Americans are not
safer, nor is the world. We are already paying far too high a price for this spectacular
failure. Our refusal to change course will merely compound this colossally expensive folly of
empire.

In the latest opinion polls, 55 percent of Iraqis say they would feel safer if U.S. and other
foreign troops left the country immediately. For a change, the U.S. should give the Iraqis
what they want.

Phyllis Bennis is a fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies in Washington, D.C. She is the lead
author of "Paying the Price: The Mounting Costs of the Iraq War," an IPS staff report. The
Institute is a think tank that works with social movements to forge viable and sustainable
policies to promote democracy, justice, human rights, and diversity. The full text of the report is
available online.



To: Mannie who wrote (51176)7/16/2004 2:13:27 PM
From: jlallen  Respond to of 89467
 
Spot on there....

Was he talking about Kerry or Clinton?



To: Mannie who wrote (51176)7/18/2004 12:01:09 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
Indebted U.S. Ponders Maggots, Robbery
_________________________________

Sat Jul 17, 2004

By Alister Bull

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A mouthful of maggots could not deter Michele Goncalo from vying for a $50,000 prize in a television game show because, like millions of other Americans, she wants to clear her credit-card debts.

Besides tasting insect larvae on "Fear Factor," she crawled out of a helicopter as it hovered over a chilly lake.

But luck was not with her. Goncalo was eliminated from the show, and a few weeks later the Federal Reserve raised interest rates for the first time since 2000.

U.S. consumers are laboring under more than $2 trillion in debt after years of easy credit. And with that era drawing to a close, the plight of those who borrowed too much has fallen under a harsh spotlight.

Goncalo declined to be interviewed, but she said on "Fear Factor" that if she won the prize, she would use it to wipe her slate clear of debt.

Others whose obligations have gotten out of hand say constant demands for payment can quickly create a sense of desperation.

Ric Wade, who had $16,000 in debts after renovating a house he couldn't sell, said he was getting six calls a day from credit-card companies.

"I told them I just don't have the money," the South Miami resident said. "I can go and rob a bank?"

CREDIT-CARD NATION

Americans possess more than 600 million credit cards, or 4.8 for every holder in the country, and have loaded that plastic up with some $700 billion.

Wade turned to a nonprofit credit counseling organization -- a growth industry in the United States -- and got his monthly bills cut to $450 from $1,400 under a four-year repayment plan he hopes to complete ahead of schedule.

"We're a consumer nation, and advertising works," he said. "They create demand and you feel that you've got to have it ... They don't ask 'Can you afford it?' You just look at the monthly payments, and suddenly you can afford it."

Affordability has become less certain after the Fed's June quarter-point rate hike to 1.25 percent, which economists see as the first of a number of moves to keep inflation tame.

According to the influential Blue Chip survey, top economists on average see the fed funds rate at 2 percent by year-end and 3.5 percent by December 2005.

How debtors react to the pinch from rising borrowing costs is important in an economy where consumer spending accounts for roughly two-thirds of gross domestic product.

Market interest rates, which are influenced by the fed funds rate but set independently, had climbed even before the Fed moved on June 30. Their rise was among the factors blamed for weaker household spending in the second quarter.

But Fed officials have repeatedly said they don't think consumers are at risk from tighter monetary policy even though household indebtedness stands at a record and debt service levels, a measure of monthly interest obligations as a percentage of disposable income, are also near their peak.

One reason policy-makers remain sanguine is that many households used low interest rates to consolidate debts into single, longer-term loans.

This pushed up debt levels, but disguised an underlying improvement in the strength of household finances and their ability to absorb higher interest rates, Fed officials say.

"Although there are pockets of financial stress among households, the sector as a whole appears in good shape," Federal Reserve Board Governor Susan Schmidt Bies said on Thursday.

But those dealing daily with people drowning in debt see enormous problems.

"This will hurt the middle class, families on $30,000-$70,000 a year," said Howard Dvorkin, founder and president of Consolidated Credit Counseling Services in Fort Lauderdale, Florida.

EASY MONEY

Americans received 4.9 billion unsolicited offers for credit cards through the mail last year. While the success rate of these marketing efforts is just 0.6 percent, a lot of the wrong people have been tempted into signing up.

Dvorkin has students with no current income turning up for counseling after charging thousands of dollars to their cards. His average customer has $23,000 on plastic.

Nor is it just credit cards. Some people are also having trouble repaying bank loans, and higher interest rates would only make this more difficult.

Dvorkin calculated that a 2 percentage-point increase on a typical 20-year, variable rate home equity line of $50,000 would raise the final interest bill by $60 a month, or $14,000 for the life of the loan.

"These families are doing what they have to do (to get by)," he said, "but a 2 or 3 percentage point rise in interest rates will hit them pretty bad."

Would this make a difference to spending? Definitely, say people at the receiving end.

"If rates go up, it makes everything more of a struggle," said Ted Long, now within a couple of months of completing a debt workout thrashed out in counseling. "It would have had a severely negative impact on our financial decisions if we still had the credit card debt we had back then."

Long and his wife ran up $11,000 on cards and were paying $650 a month -- more than the rent on their Hollywood, Florida, home -- before going to the counselors.

"I didn't wake up one morning and decide 'I'll want $11,000 credit,' but it just builds up little by little," Long said. "People think credit cards are like money or a paycheck, and that is so wrong."

reuters.com



To: Mannie who wrote (51176)7/18/2004 12:57:22 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Weekend Stock Market Analysis

amateur-investors.com



To: Mannie who wrote (51176)7/18/2004 4:28:55 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Message 20322023