Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: brian1501 who wrote (194687)	7/16/2004 3:06:20 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575625

Why do you think a constitutional amendment is needed to protect marriage? That's a different discussion <g>. I think this nation was founded on certain morals (some religious, some not), and they should be protected. I have less problem with allowing civil unions that carry the same legal weight as a marriage, but two men, two women are not a marriage. If the two men or two women believe its a marriage, why is it not a marriage? And what does it matter to you? You and your wife's marriage is not hurt by their belief. So what's the big deal? ted