SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio candidates - Moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Eric L who wrote (1017)7/17/2004 8:52:53 PM
From: Thomas Mercer-Hursh  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2955
 
The same was true of GSM where "the committee" could not (or actually did not) define the architecture in such a way as to exclude the use of Motorola's FDD IP, and Ericsson whose baseline was used had little or no IP in GSM initially, and neither did Nokia, but having architectural control of a system and having (some) essential IP from which one derives revenue or offsets other IP through cross-licensing are two related but distinct matters.

To me, one of the indicators of the strength of Qualcomm's position is the size of the royalty which it can demand. Was this at all comparable with GSM?



To: Eric L who wrote (1017)7/18/2004 9:08:36 AM
From: Apollo  Respond to of 2955
 
Wonderful string of comments on Qcom, and its pongid virtues, virtual or real. <g> My gratitude to the participants.

Speaks to the great potential of this thread, which has been underutilized this past year.

Apollo