Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (51617)	1/9/2005 6:35:11 PM
From: Moominoid	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 74559

Hi I just popped back in and SI seems to have morphed strangely. Yes everything you wrte about plate tectonics, biogeophysical cycles etc. is 100% correct and no big secret at all. For example see Danny Harvey's book: "Global Warming the Hard Science". The rates of these processes will change as CO2 in the atmosphere increases but not fast enough I think to make much difference to the scale of anthropogenic change. Changes in land based carbon fixation, methane release etc. seem like they will be more important. I have been working on my new time series model of climate change. This latest one has a two layer ocean. Only since 2000-1 has the data been available to do time series modeling of the global ocean. The data is still very poor. But it makes a big difference to the results. Now my results look extremely similar to those out of global circulation models. Of course I only have six equations running on my Mac - it is much much less computationally intensive... David (Moom)