SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : I Will Continue to Continue, to Pretend.... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: abstract who wrote (3600)7/19/2004 5:15:55 AM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
LOL! You have to use a Bush hating, left wing, opinion
propagandist to make your point.

FWIW, that does actually fit here as another example of
reality defying opinions being presented as fact.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Arianna Huffington Lets Loose About the Left Wing
Wednesday, April 21, 2004

This is a partial transcript from "The O'Reilly Factor," April 20, 2004 that has been edited for clarity.

Watch The O'Reilly Factor weeknights at 8 p.m. and 11 p.m. ET and listen to the Radio Factor!

BILL O’REILLY, HOST: In the "Back of the Book" segment tonight, as you may know, I have a big problem with both the far left and the far right in America. I believe extremists hurt this country and should be scorned. Enter Arianna Huffington (search), a political pundit who used to be a conservative then has steadily moved to the left. Her new book is called "Fanatics & Fools: A Game Plan for Winning Back America." I spoke with her a few days ago.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

O'REILLY: <font size=4>You can understand how people like me and maybe a lot of people watching think you are a loony lefty when your book, "Fanatics & Fools," which I like the title, but I hope you are not in that group, is endorsed by the following: Molly Ivins (search); Bill Maher, Bill Moyers; and Larry David. Why don't you get Che Guevera on that, oh, he's dead. How about Fidel Castro? Come on, there are far left fringe. That's who you're hanging with, Arianna.<font size=3>

ARIANNA HUFFINGTON: What about the book itself?

O'REILLY: These people love the book. Who do you think is going to read it?

HUFFINGTON: Well, first of all, you see, you are now doing guilt by association.

O'REILLY: Guilt by association?

HUFFINGTON: Yes, instead of looking at the book because you don't like the people who are endorsing it.

O'REILLY: No, I looked at the book.

HUFFINGTON: Well, let's talk about what you think about the ideas...

O'REILLY: <font size=4>No, no, no, no, no. Look, you are a smart lady, all right, and people who read the book will get something out of it. I will say that. OK? But you have to admit if you are going to go into this crew, Ivins, Moyers and David, if you are going to land there, that is what you are going to be typed as.<font size=3>

HUFFINGTON: <font size=4>I admire these people.<font size=3>

O'REILLY: <font size=4>Why?<font size=3>

HUFFINGTON: <font size=4>Yes. Because they are fighting the same battle I'm fighting. They're fighting the battle...<font size=3>

O'REILLY: <font size=4>But then I can call you a far left person.<font size=3>

HUFFINGTON: Because you see, these definitions, Bill, of left, right, are really destroying our ability to communicate with each other. Why is it left wing to be in favor of closing corporate tax loopholes?

O'REILLY: That isn't left wing. That fair.

HUFFINGTON: You and I agree on that. Why is it left wing, as you and I agree, to be against gas guzzlers when Detroit could produce fuel efficient cars? Why is that left wing?

O'REILLY: I'm for that.

HUFFINGTON: I know you are. So what I'm saying is that there's a lot of common ground. And if we can come together and do what did not happen after September 11, when the public was really ready to commit itself to something larger.

O'REILLY: <font size=4>Arianna, these people that you are associating with who blurbed your book are people who want a huge government and enormous spending, who want partial birth abortion all day long, who don't want a military response to terrorism. I mean, come on.<font size=3>

HUFFINGTON: Bill, can I respond to what you said? Because right now, let's take the military response to terrorism. You know and you yourself have admitted that we went into Iraq for the wrong reason. We found no WMD. I personally believe the world is less safe because we went to Iraq and I believe...

O'REILLY: And I respect that belief but I disagree with you.

HUFFINGTON: But my point is it is a perfectly legitimate to have been from the beginning against the war in Iraq and to have been in favor instead of strengthening homeland security. I agree with you that Tenet should have resigned or been fired a long time ago. And listening to Tenet during his testimony...

O'REILLY: <font size=4>We have common ground but the problem I think that you have fallen into, with all due respect, because I like you, I want your book to do OK, is that you are hanging out with fringe people, all right, who Americans despise. They do. They despise these people because these people are just ramming socialism and stuff like that down people's throats.<font size=3>

HUFFINGTON: Oh, Bill, let me just say...

O'REILLY: <font size=4>You don't think Molly Ivins is a socialist, read her books. She even admitted it.<font size=3>

HUFFINGTON: I have read her books. Bill, let me just say something. They are Americans, the same kind of Americans...

O'REILLY: Ted Bundy was an American.

HUFFINGTON: Oh come on.

O'REILLY: All right. That is a joke. That is a joke. Just kidding.

HUFFINGTON: There are Americans just as many if not more, who love Molly Ivins, as there are who love you. They are no less Americans...

O'REILLY: Well, I'm not easy to love.

HUFFINGTON: My point is they are no less American because they love her.

O'REILLY: All right, it is just a matter, you have to pick your friends wisely. I will give you the last word. Go ahead.

HUFFINGTON: OK. The last word is that I love the people you mentioned. They are my friends. I admire them. But beyond that what I'm saying is that what this country needs right now is a bigger vision than the incrementalism that we've had from the Democratic Party and what we've had from the Republican Party, which is big spending, which you've just attacked, a huge boondoggle in the Medicare initiative. And I'm sure you're not in favor of no cost containment, and multi-trillion dollar tax cuts, deficits as far as the eye can see that. I mean, that is not a conservative position.

foxnews.com

Arianna, David and Me
mediaresearch.org

Arianna Huffington Vows to Overthrow Arnold By Force of Arms
bongonews.com

Left wing publishers finding their niche
variety.com



To: abstract who wrote (3600)7/19/2004 5:23:04 AM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Not a word in our media. Amazing.

<font size=4>Flip-Flop By Proxy<font size=3>
Captain Ed

The London Telegraph reports that John Kerry has sent his brother out to Israel to shore up the Jewish vote, which appears to be slipping from the grasp of Democrats this election cycle. His brother delivered a message of total support for Israel, including on the security fence, despite earlier assertions by both Kerrys that it amounted to nothing more than a barrier to peace:
<font color=blue>
John Kerry, the Democratic senator and presidential candidate, has sent his brother Cameron, a Jewish convert, on a delicate political mission to Israel to shore up Jewish support ahead of November's election.

The visit, which was due to end last night, has delighted Israeli government officials but has dismayed left-wing Israeli peace activists and Palestinian leaders, whom Mr Kerry studiously avoided as he voiced stridently pro-Israeli views on behalf of his brother. ...
<font color=black>
He echoed the Israeli government's line on refusing to negotiate with Yasser Arafat, the Palestinian leader, and added: <font color=blue>"There is no Palestinian partner at this time. It is not the place of the US to pressure Israel to reach an agreement with the Palestinians."<font color=black>

More controversially, he said the 425-mile security wall was <font color=blue>"essential for the security of Israel"<font color=black> - <font size=4>an apparent reversal of remarks by his brother, earlier in the campaign, in which he described the wall as <font color=blue>"a barrier to peace".<font color=black><font size=3>

With events overtaking the besieged Palestinian strongman, quibbling over his status may well be a moot point anyway. Otherwise, one could easily recall that just seven years ago, <font size=4>Kerry hailed Arafat as a <font color=blue>"statesman"<font color=black> in his book on global challenges that his campaign touted earlier to build a reputation for Kerry as a visionary. However, let there be no dispute about the reversal Kerry has executed on Israeli security; eight months ago he opposed the wall, and now that he needs to hold the Jewish vote, he has flopped to the other side.

The International Herald-Tribune also notes the policy shift in an article from two weeks ago:
<font color=blue>
He calls for more forceful action to prevent Iran from gaining nuclear weapons, fully backs Israel's construction of a barrier between Israel and the Palestinian territories in the West Bank and pledges to work to push for a new Palestinian political class to replace Yasser Arafat, who is called a "failed leader."
<font color=black>
Kerry got off to a shaky start with some Jewish groups, including his reference last October to the barrier as a <font color=blue>"barrier to peace."<font color=black> The structure, which is to stretch 680 kilometers, or 425 miles, is formed mostly of electronic fencing with razor wire but has some sections that are concrete.

The new paper calls it <font color=blue>"a security fence"<font color=black> and says building it is <font color=blue>"a legitimate right of self-defense"<font color=black> and <font color=blue>"not a matter"<font color=black> to be taken up by the International Court of Justice, which has criticized the construction.

The Telegraph also notes that the Europeans are likely to be less than thrilled with Kerry's new position, perhaps taking some of the enthusiasm for Kerry's candidacy out of those foreign leaders who were so anxious to endorse him back in the late winter. They need not be worried too much; after all, Kerry's positions will evolve back towards theirs eventually.

It seems that inconsistency is the only consistency of the
Kerry campaign.


captainsquartersblog.com