SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Win Smith who wrote (140846)7/18/2004 7:12:22 PM
From: Ish  Respond to of 281500
 
<<All's fair when you really, really want to have a war, I guess.>>

You guess a lot don't you.



To: Win Smith who wrote (140846)7/19/2004 10:39:03 AM
From: carranza2  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Well, Win, I was able to buy and peruse the NYT Sunday edition at the airport, and noted that the story was buried at the bottom of p.10, where virtually 100% of the reports favorable to the Administration are routinely placed.

The relevant issue is the emphasis placed on the report, not the number of reports which are issued.



To: Win Smith who wrote (140846)7/19/2004 10:41:37 AM
From: jlallen  Respond to of 281500
 
At any rate, I don't exactly see how any of it excuses W's handlers blowing Plame's cover

I was not aware that the investigaiton had concluded nor that any indictments which would indicate that such actions had actually occurred had been issued.....its clear now that Wilson lied......can you fill us in on the results of the investigaiton since you seem to be aware of facts I have not seen reported....???


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News