Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (140891)	7/19/2004 2:46:11 PM
From: GST	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

In case you missed what Kay said: <Bush and Blair "should have been able to tell before the war that the evidence did not exist for drawing the conclusion that Iraq presented a clear, present and imminent threat on the basis of existing weapons of mass destruction." "That was not something that required a war," he said.> Message 20322732

To: jlallen who wrote (140891)	7/19/2004 3:04:11 PM
From: cnyndwllr	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Jlallen, I remember the many times you wrote "I am waiting for the Kay report" whenever anyone said that the wmd rationale wouldn't stand up. Now you're faced with GST's post that says; In case you missed what Kay said: <Bush and Blair "should have been able to tell before the war that the evidence did not exist for drawing the conclusion that Iraq presented a clear, present and imminent threat on the basis of existing weapons of mass destruction." "That was not something that required a war," he said. I'm curious to know whether you're still waiting?