Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SilentZ who wrote (194992)	7/19/2004 5:25:36 PM
From: i-node	Respond to of 1573432

>> Poppycock! I've never known a single one of the second. Fine. You haven't. I have. In particular, in the early 70s I encountered a number of individuals who made a lifestyle choice to be gay. Several have continued it until this day, and now, you would fully believe they were born gay. But had you known them prior to their decision, you would have known they were not born homosexuals. I'll spare you further details as they've been previously posted in this thread.

To: SilentZ who wrote (194992)	7/19/2004 5:36:01 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1573432

>Homosexuality is not sheerly biological. This is propanganda put forth to make it more justifiable. Some gays are born gay, some learn it. I've known many of both varieties. Poppycock! I've never known a single one of the second. Z, There are Valencia oranges and there are Navel oranges. Some of those oranges wanted to be Navel; others had no choice but to be Valencia. Sometimes its in the genome and sometimes its in the DNA. And then there is the environment and paedophiles. Well, I think you get my drift. ted