Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (195008)	7/19/2004 7:54:58 PM
From: Road Walker	Respond to of 1575859

re: They acted under the authority of, and where ordered in to the combat by Clinton. He was not their direct commander in the field no president has led soldiers in to battle as president since George Washington. Their direct commander in the field was a NATO officer (in this case he coincidentally happened to be an American). What is it about this detail that you find so hard to understand, or accept. You pick the best guy to command NATO forces, of Coalition forces, or UN forces. Who gives a sh-t if it's an American or Mexican or an Algerian? If you can't stand the idea of American troops be commanded by someone from another country, you ought to examine your prejudices. You are wearing your patriotism on your sleeve. John